Why does a generic cast of a List<? extends Set..> to List succeed on Sun JDK 6 but fail to compile on Oracle JDK 7?

Question

The following code

class GenericCompilationFailureDemo {
    List newList() { 
        return new ArrayList

        

Answer 1

This is apparently a javac7 bug. It should be allowed per casting conversion rules [1]

One of the rules allows a narrowing reference conversion ... followed by an unchecked conversion

Casting List => List is allowed by this rule

List => List   // narrowing reference conversion
List => List   // unchecked conversion

That's not all the story though; the spec has further rules to forbid casting like List=>List, for they are provably distinct parameterized types. There is no object belonging to the two types at the same time, so compiler think it's better to disallow this apparent programming error. (You can bypass it by explicitly List=>List=>List)

The last rule doesn't apply here though; so it looks like a javac7 bug.

Why the last rule doesn't apply: so we are casting List to List. Here capture conversion is applied to List [2] so we are actually casting List to List, where T is a new type variable with upper bound A.

The question is whether List and List are provably distinct parameterized types. My understanding is that it's false (it has to be false for your first two examples to compile). Since T is a type variable, it can take a value to make List and List the same parameterized type (i.e. when T=A). This reasoning should work for any type A.

[1] http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/conversions.html#5.5

[2] http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/expressions.html#341306