Swift Set of Structure Types

后端 未结 2 1178
悲哀的现实
悲哀的现实 2021-02-07 15:45

Say I have a struct, which could be anything:

struct Cube {
    var x: Int
    var y: Int
    var z: Int
    var width: Int
    // ...
}
         


        
2条回答
  •  深忆病人
    2021-02-07 16:33

    First of all, Hashable extends Equatable, so you must implement a == operator which compares two values, using all properties which uniquely identify a cube:

    func ==(lhs: Cube, rhs: Cube) -> Bool {
        return lhs.x == rhs.x && lhs.y == rhs.y && lhs.z == rhs.z && lhs.width == rhs.width
    }
    

    The Hashable protocol only requires that

    x == y implies x.hashValue == y.hashValue

    so

    var hashValue: Int {
        return 0
    }
    

    would be a valid (and working) implementation. However, this would put all objects in the same hash bucket of a set (or dictionary), which is not effective. A better implementation is for example

    struct Cube: Hashable {
        var x: Int
        var y: Int
        var z: Int
        var width: Int
    
        var hashValue: Int {
            return x.hashValue ^ y.hashValue ^ z.hashValue ^ width.hashValue
        }
    }
    

    Here the "XOR" operator ^ is chosen because it cannot overflow. You could also use the "overflow operator" &+.

    More sophisticated hash functions would be able to distinguish different values better, so that the set operations become faster. On the other hand, the computation of the hash function itself would be slower. Therefore I would look for a "better" hash function only if the set operations turn out to be a performance bottleneck in your program.


    Update: As of Swift 4.1 (Xcode 9.4) the compiler can synthesize the == and hashValue methods if all members of the struct are Equatable/Hashable. Therefore is suffices to declare the conformance:

    struct Cube: Hashable {
        var x: Int
        var y: Int
        var z: Int
        var width: Int
    }
    

提交回复
热议问题