What is different about C++ math.h abs() compared to my abs()

Question

I am currently writing some glsl like vector math classes in C++, and I just implemented an abs() function like this:

template
static         


        

Answer 1

Probably the library version of abs is an intrinsic function, whose behavior is exactly known by the compiler, which can even compute the value at compile time (since in your case it's known) and optimize the call away. You should try your benchmark with a value known only at runtime (provided by the user or got with rand() before the two cycles).

If there's still a difference, it may be because the library abs is written directly in hand-forged assembly with magic tricks, so it could be a little faster than the generated one.