It is a technique used frequently in On Lisp, which is on Common Lisp:
> (mapcar #\'(lambda (x) (+ x 10))
\'(1 2 3))
(11 12 13)
It all has to do with history. (lambda ...)
is just syntactic sugar for #'(lambda ..)
. Earlier versions of Common Lisp didn't have lambda
defined as a macro. Eg. if you read Peter Norvigs essay about Quines (PD, page2) you see he explicitly states you need to create such macro as follows:
(defmacro lambda (args &body body)
"Allow (lambda (x) ...) instead of #'(lambda (x) ...)"
`#'(lambda ,args .,body))
Thus when writing (lambda ...)
today a standard macro rewrites it to #'(lambda ...)
.
On Lisp is an old book and it may have been first published before the macro became standard. It also may be that Paul Graham is used to write #'(lambda ...)
and has stuck with it.
I've seen that later editions of computer books often change as little as possible when conforming to a newer standard. I'm not sure that is a good thing.