Javascript equality triple equals but what about greater than and less than?

后端 未结 4 2022
轮回少年
轮回少年 2021-02-07 05:11

I was explaining to a colleague that you should use === and !== (and >== and <== of course) when comparing variables in

4条回答
  •  再見小時候
    2021-02-07 05:48

    No, there's no need for such operators. The type checking done for those relational operators is different than for equality and inequality. (edit — perhaps it's a little strong to say that there's "no need"; that's true only because JavaScript deems it so :-)

    Specifically, the > and < and >= and <= operators all operate either on two numeric values, or two strings, preferring numeric values. That is, if one value is a number, then the other is treated as a number. If a non-number can't be cleanly converted to a number (that is, if it ends up as NaN), then the result of the comparison is undefined. (That's a little problematic, because undefined will look like false in the context of an if statement.)

    If both values are strings, then a collating-order string comparison is performed instead.

    If you think about it, these comparisons don't make any sense for object instances; what does it mean for an object to be "greater than" another? I suppose, perhaps, that this means that if you're finding yourself with values of variant types being compared like this, and that's causing problems, then yes you have to detect the situation yourself. It seems to me that it would be good to work upstream and think about whether there's something fishy about the code that's leading to such a situation.

提交回复
热议问题