How can I use threading in Python?

前端 未结 19 2714
迷失自我
迷失自我 2020-11-21 04:54

I am trying to understand threading in Python. I\'ve looked at the documentation and examples, but quite frankly, many examples are overly sophisticated and I\'m having trou

19条回答
  •  不知归路
    2020-11-21 05:08

    I would like to contribute with a simple example and the explanations I've found useful when I had to tackle this problem myself.

    In this answer you will find some information about Python's GIL (global interpreter lock) and a simple day-to-day example written using multiprocessing.dummy plus some simple benchmarks.

    Global Interpreter Lock (GIL)

    Python doesn't allow multi-threading in the truest sense of the word. It has a multi-threading package, but if you want to multi-thread to speed your code up, then it's usually not a good idea to use it.

    Python has a construct called the global interpreter lock (GIL). The GIL makes sure that only one of your 'threads' can execute at any one time. A thread acquires the GIL, does a little work, then passes the GIL onto the next thread.

    This happens very quickly so to the human eye it may seem like your threads are executing in parallel, but they are really just taking turns using the same CPU core.

    All this GIL passing adds overhead to execution. This means that if you want to make your code run faster then using the threading package often isn't a good idea.

    There are reasons to use Python's threading package. If you want to run some things simultaneously, and efficiency is not a concern, then it's totally fine and convenient. Or if you are running code that needs to wait for something (like some I/O) then it could make a lot of sense. But the threading library won't let you use extra CPU cores.

    Multi-threading can be outsourced to the operating system (by doing multi-processing), and some external application that calls your Python code (for example, Spark or Hadoop), or some code that your Python code calls (for example: you could have your Python code call a C function that does the expensive multi-threaded stuff).

    Why This Matters

    Because lots of people spend a lot of time trying to find bottlenecks in their fancy Python multi-threaded code before they learn what the GIL is.

    Once this information is clear, here's my code:

    #!/bin/python
    from multiprocessing.dummy import Pool
    from subprocess import PIPE,Popen
    import time
    import os
    
    # In the variable pool_size we define the "parallelness".
    # For CPU-bound tasks, it doesn't make sense to create more Pool processes
    # than you have cores to run them on.
    #
    # On the other hand, if you are using I/O-bound tasks, it may make sense
    # to create a quite a few more Pool processes than cores, since the processes
    # will probably spend most their time blocked (waiting for I/O to complete).
    pool_size = 8
    
    def do_ping(ip):
        if os.name == 'nt':
            print ("Using Windows Ping to " + ip)
            proc = Popen(['ping', ip], stdout=PIPE)
            return proc.communicate()[0]
        else:
            print ("Using Linux / Unix Ping to " + ip)
            proc = Popen(['ping', ip, '-c', '4'], stdout=PIPE)
            return proc.communicate()[0]
    
    
    os.system('cls' if os.name=='nt' else 'clear')
    print ("Running using threads\n")
    start_time = time.time()
    pool = Pool(pool_size)
    website_names = ["www.google.com","www.facebook.com","www.pinterest.com","www.microsoft.com"]
    result = {}
    for website_name in website_names:
        result[website_name] = pool.apply_async(do_ping, args=(website_name,))
    pool.close()
    pool.join()
    print ("\n--- Execution took {} seconds ---".format((time.time() - start_time)))
    
    # Now we do the same without threading, just to compare time
    print ("\nRunning NOT using threads\n")
    start_time = time.time()
    for website_name in website_names:
        do_ping(website_name)
    print ("\n--- Execution took {} seconds ---".format((time.time() - start_time)))
    
    # Here's one way to print the final output from the threads
    output = {}
    for key, value in result.items():
        output[key] = value.get()
    print ("\nOutput aggregated in a Dictionary:")
    print (output)
    print ("\n")
    
    print ("\nPretty printed output: ")
    for key, value in output.items():
        print (key + "\n")
        print (value)
    

提交回复
热议问题