I\'ve been a proponent of adopting Moose (and MooseX::Declare) at work for several months. The style it encourages will really help the maintainability of our codebase, but not
I'm glad you like MooseX::Declare
. However, the method signature validation
errors you're talking about aren't really from there, but from
MooseX::Method::Signatures
, which in turn uses MooseX::Types::Structured
for
its validation needs. Every validation error you currently see comes unmodified
from MooseX::Types::Structured
.
I'm also going to ignore the stack-trace part of the error message. I happen to find them incredibly useful, and so does the rest of Moose cabal. I'm not going to removed them by default.
If you want a way to turn them off, Moose needs to be changed to throw exception objects instead of strings for type-constraint validation errors and possibly other things. Those could always capture a backtrace, but the decision on whether or not to display it, or how exactly to format it when displaying, could be made elsewhere, and the user would be free to modify the default behaviour - globally, locally, lexically, whatever.
What I'm going to address is building the actual validation error messages for method signatures.
As pointed out, MooseX::Types::Structured
does the actual validation
work. When something fails to validate, it's its job to raise an exception. This
exception currently happens to be a string, so it's not all that useful when
wanting to build beautiful errors, so that needs to change, similar to the issue
with stack traces above.
Once MooseX::Types::Structured throws structured exception objects, which might look somewhat like
bless({
type => Tuple[Tuple[Object,Int],Dict[z,Optional[Str],y,Optional[Str]]],
err => [
0 => bless({
type => Tuple[Object,Int],
err => [
0 => undef,
1 => bless({
type => Int,
err => bless({}, 'ValidationError::MissingValue'),
}, 'ValidationError'),
],
}, 'ValidationError::Tuple'),
1 => undef,
],
}, 'ValidationError::Tuple')
we would have enough information available to actually correlate individual
inner validation errors with parts of the signature in MooseX::Method::Signatures
. In the above example, and
given your (Int $id, Str :$z, Str :$y)
signature, it'd be easy enough to know
that the very inner Validation::MissingValue
for the second element of the
tuple for positional parameters was supposed to provide a value for $id
, but
couldn't.
Given that, it'll be easy to generate errors such as
http://files.perldition.org/err1.png
or
http://files.perldition.org/err2.png
which is kind of what I'm going for, instead of just formatting the horrible messages we have right now more nicely. However, if one wanted to do that, it'd still be easy enough once we have structured validation exceptions instead of plain strings.
None of this is actually hard - it just needs doing. If anyone feels like helping
out with this, come talk to us in #moose
on irc.perl.org
.