Newest symfony installer vs composer

Question

I\'d like to know whats the difference when creating new symfony project with new symfony installer that has appeared last time and old-way composer.

I\'ve installed lat

Answer 1

As Leggendario already explained, the installer downloads the dist files from the website (a .tar.gz or .zip file). This speeds up the installation process quite a bit.

However, when building the dist files, symfony.com uses a custom build script which removes some files and changes some things. On the other hand, composer simply downloads the repository for you.

The main differences:

• Composer downloads the latest dependencies (as Leggendario pointed out), while the build script contains the latest files at the moment of building.
• Composer uses the dev versions and thus uses git clone to download the packages. The build script uses only stable packages, which will make Composer use the dist version. Some packages remove test and doc files from their dist files.
• Composer contains all project related information, like a .gitignore. The build script previously assumed the person installing it didn't have git, so removed this file and other git related files like the .gitkeep files in app/cache and app/logs.

I any case, both the installer and composer always give you a working version of the Symfony Standard Edition.

At last, the build script was changed now the installer became the official way of installing. It'll now contain the git related files. On the other hand, it'll not contain the LICENSE file, UPGRADE-*.md files and README.md file. So in the end, we can say that the one installed by the installer is more usable, as it removes useless files.