JWT (Json web token) Vs Custom Token

Question

I was looking through the questions but I did not find anything which could solve my doubt. I found extensive information about JWT, but not much when comparing the advantages J

Answer 1

JWT tokens contain claims, which are statements about the subject (for example the logged in user). These statements can be things like name, email, roles etc. JWT tokens are digitally signed and not vulnerable to CSRF attacks.

These two characteristics make sure that the service receiving the token does not need to go back to the issuing authentication server to verify the validity of the token or get information about the subject.

This increases the ability of a system using JWT tokens to scale in a significant way. JWT tokens do require a secure transportation channel (HTTPS).

The downside of this is that tokens cannot be revoked (as there's no central server guarding over these tokens). That's why tokens typically have a short lifetime.

Tokens holding a session id on the other hand do need to contact the authentication server to validate the token (usually database lookup) and retrieve information on the subject (another database lookup).

Validation of HMAC tokens requires the knowledge of the secret key used to generate the token. Typically the receiving service (your API) will need to contact the authentication server as that server is where the secret is being kept.

HMAC tokens and session ids are typically stored in cookies. Cookies cannot be used for cross-domain service calls and need to be protected against CSRF attacks.