int n;
int main()
{
[](){ n = 0; }(); // clang says \"ok\"
int m;
[](){ m = 0; }(); // clang says \"not ok\"
}
I just wonder:
Yes, sure. Normal name lookup rules apply.
[expr.prim.lambda]/7 ... for purposes of name lookup ... the compound-statement is considered in the context of the lambda-expression.
Re: why local variables are treated differently from global ones.
[expr.prim.lambda]/13 ... If a lambda-expression or an instantiation of the function call operator template of a generic lambda odr-uses (3.2)
this
or a variable with automatic storage duration from its reaching scope, that entity shall be captured by the lambda-expression.[expr.prim.lambda]/9 A lambda-expression whose smallest enclosing scope is a block scope (3.3.3) is a local lambda expression... The reaching scope of a local lambda expression is the set of enclosing scopes up to and including the innermost enclosing function and its parameters.
In your example, m
is a variable with automatic storage duration from the lambda's reaching scope, and so shall be captured. n
is not, and so doesn't have to be.