I\'m trying to capture user\'s audio input from the browser. I have done it with WAV but the files are really big. A friend of mine told me that OGG files are much smaller. Does
To those who down-voted this post: It's really not productive to down-vote questions without taking the time to offer some kind of insight into why the question is somehow 'bad'. I think this question has merit, and the poster clearly has spent some time trying to solve the issue on their own. The Web Audio spec is actually intended to allow exactly this kind of functionality, but is just not close to fulfilling that purpose yet:
This specification describes a high-level JavaScript API for processing and synthesizing audio in web applications. The primary paradigm is of an audio routing graph, where a number of AudioNode objects are connected together to define the overall audio rendering. The actual processing will primarily take place in the underlying implementation (typically optimized Assembly / C / C++ code), but direct JavaScript processing and synthesis is also supported.
Here's a statement on the current w3c audio spec draft, which makes the following points:
ECMAScript (js) is really fast for a lot of things, and is getting faster all the time depending on what engine is interpreting the code. For something as intensive as audio processing however, you would be much better off using a low-level tool that's compiled to optimize resources specific to the task. I'm currently using ffmpeg on the server side to accomplish something similar.
I know that it is really inefficient to have to send a wav file across an internet connection just to obtain a more compact .ogg file, but that's the current state of things with the web audio api. To do any client-side processing the user would have to explicitly give access to the local file system and execution privileges for the file to make the conversion. Hopefully someone will address this glaring problem soon. Good luck.
Edit: You could also use Google's native-client if you don't mind limiting your users to Chrome. It seems like very promising technology that loads in a sandbox and achieves speeds nearly as good natively executed code. I'm assuming that there will be similar implementations in other browsers at some point.