I\'m having problems with this code. I don\'t want to look at others, so I\'m wondering what\'s wrong with mine.
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are mu
A small improvement for the other answers (i
can start from 3
):
public static void main(String[] args) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 3; i < 1000; i++) {
if (i % 3 == 0 || i % 5 == 0) {
sum += i;
}
}
System.out.println(sum);
}
For a bigger input number ( Integer.MAX_VALUE
instead of 1000
) it takes:
This is more efficient and uses your initial approach (remove numbers that were taken twice):
public static void main(String[] args) {
long sum = 0 ;
for ( long i = 3 ; i < 1000 ; i+=3 ){
sum+=i;
}
for ( long i = 5 ; i < 1000 ; i+=5 ){
sum+=i;
}
for ( long i = 15 ; i < 1000 ; i+=15 ){
sum-=i;
}
System.out.println(sum);
}
In the first case we have about n
(1000) values for i
, in the second case we have only about n/3 + n/5 + n/15
(600) values for i
. The second one is also better because there are fewer comparisons ( no if
involved ).
For a bigger input number ( Integer.MAX_VALUE
instead of 1000
) it takes:
This solution is based on the following observation:
1 + 2 + ... + n = n*(n+1)/2
public static void main(String[] args) {
int nr = 1000;
nr--;
int x3 = nr/3;
int x5 = nr/5;
int x15 = nr/15;
long sum1 = 3*x3*(x3+1);
long sum2 = 5*x5*(x5+1);
long sum3 = 15*x15*(x15+1);
long sum = (sum1+sum2-sum3)/2;
System.out.println(sum);
}
In this case, even if the input is Integer.MAX_VALUE
, the computation is very fast ( less than 1 ms ).