Can Haskell's Control.Concurrent.Async.mapConcurrently have a limit?

后端 未结 5 505
有刺的猬
有刺的猬 2021-02-04 08:45

I\'m attempting to run multiple downloads in parallel in Haskell, which I would normally just use the Control.Concurrent.Async.mapConcurrently function for. However, doing so o

5条回答
  •  囚心锁ツ
    2021-02-04 09:04

    Chunking the threads may be inefficient if a few of them last significantly longer than the others. Here is a smoother, yet more complex, solution:

    {-# LANGUAGE TupleSections #-}
    import Control.Concurrent.Async (async, waitAny)
    import Data.List                (delete, sortBy)
    import Data.Ord                 (comparing)
    
    concurrentlyLimited :: Int -> [IO a] -> IO [a]
    concurrentlyLimited n tasks = concurrentlyLimited' n (zip [0..] tasks) [] []
    
    concurrentlyLimited' _ [] [] results = return . map snd $ sortBy (comparing fst) results
    concurrentlyLimited' 0 todo ongoing results = do
        (task, newResult) <- waitAny ongoing
        concurrentlyLimited' 1 todo (delete task ongoing) (newResult:results)
    concurrentlyLimited' n [] ongoing results = concurrentlyLimited' 0 [] ongoing results
    concurrentlyLimited' n ((i, task):otherTasks) ongoing results = do
        t <- async $ (i,) <$> task
        concurrentlyLimited' (n-1) otherTasks (t:ongoing) results
    

    Note : the above code could be made more generic using an instance of MonadBaseControl IO in place of IO, thanks to lifted-async.

提交回复
热议问题