I\'ve been using PowerShell for a number of years, and I thought I had a handle on some of its more \'eccentric\' behaviour, but I\'ve hit an issue I can\'t make head nor tail o
return
and [pscustomobject]
are red herrings here, in a way.
What it comes down to is:
Implicit expression output vs. cmdlet-produced output; using return
(without a cmdlet call) falls into the former category, using Write-Output
into the latter.
Output objects getting wrapped in - mostly invisible - [psobject]
instances only in cmdlet-produced output.
# Expression output: NO [psobject] wrapper:
@{ "aaa" = "bbb" } -is [psobject] # -> $False
# Cmdlet-produced output: [psobject]-wrapped
(Write-Output @{ "aaa" = "bbb" }) -is [psobject] # -> $True
Note that - surprisingly - [pscustomobject]
is the same as [psobject]
: they both refer to type [System.Management.Automation.PSObject]
, which is the normally invisible helper type that PowerShell uses behind the scenes.
(To add to the confusion, there is a separate [System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject]
type.)
For the most part, this extra [psobject]
wrapper is benign - it mostly behaves as the wrapped object would directly - but there are instances where it causes subtly different behavior (see below).
And is there a generalised way I can determine the difference from code, other than obviously checking whether every hashtable I have in a variable is also a pscustomobject
Note that a hashtable is not a PS custom object - it only appears that way for - any - [psobject]
-wrapped object due to [pscustomobject]
being the same as [psobject]
.
To detect a true PS custom object - created with [pscustomobject] @{ ... }
or New-Object PSCustomObject
/ New-Object PSObject
or produced by cmdlets such as Select-Object
and Import-Csv
- use:
$obj -is [System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject] # NOT just [pscustomobject]!
Note that using the related -as
operator with a true PS custom object is broken as of Windows PowerShell v5.1 / PowerShell Core v6.1.0 - see below.
As an example of a situation where the extra [psobject]
wrapper is benign, you can still test even a wrapped object for its type directly:
(Write-Output @{ "aaa" = "bbb" }) -is [hashtable] # $True
That is, despite the wrapper, -is
still recognizes the wrapped type.
Therefore, somewhat paradoxically, both -is [psobject]
and -is [hashtable]
return $True
in this case, even though these types are unrelated.
There is no good reason for these discrepancies and they strike me as leaky abstractions (implementations): internal constructs accidentally peeking from behind the curtain.
The following GitHub issues discuss these behaviors:
Objects are situationally invisibly [psobject]-wrapped, sometimes causing unexpected behavior.
Why is [pscustomobject] the same as [psobject], even though a distinct [System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject] type exists?
Should all [psobject] cmdlet parameters be changed to [object]?
The -as operator does not recognize System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject instances as such.