Given the 2 toString()
implementations below, which one is preferred:
public String toString(){
return \"{a:\"+ a + \", b:\" + b + \", c: \"
Using latest version of Java(1.8) the disassembly(javap -c
) shows the optimization introduced by compiler. +
as well sb.append()
will generate very similar code. However, it will be worthwhile inspecting the behaviour if we are using +
in a for loop.
Adding strings using + in a for loop
Java:
public String myCatPlus(String[] vals) {
String result = "";
for (String val : vals) {
result = result + val;
}
return result;
}
ByteCode:(for
loop excerpt)
12: iload 5
14: iload 4
16: if_icmpge 51
19: aload_3
20: iload 5
22: aaload
23: astore 6
25: new #3 // class java/lang/StringBuilder
28: dup
29: invokespecial #4 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder."":()V
32: aload_2
33: invokevirtual #5 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
36: aload 6
38: invokevirtual #5 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
41: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
44: astore_2
45: iinc 5, 1
48: goto 12
Adding strings using stringbuilder.append
Java:
public String myCatSb(String[] vals) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for(String val : vals) {
sb.append(val);
}
return sb.toString();
}
ByteCdoe:(for
loop excerpt)
17: iload 5
19: iload 4
21: if_icmpge 43
24: aload_3
25: iload 5
27: aaload
28: astore 6
30: aload_2
31: aload 6
33: invokevirtual #5 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
36: pop
37: iinc 5, 1
40: goto 17
43: aload_2
There is a bit of glaring difference though. In first case, where +
was used, new StringBuilder
is created for each for loop iteration and generated result is stored by doing a toString()
call(29 through 41). So you are generating intermediate Strings that your really do not need while using +
operator in for
loop.