I\'ve seen this answered before, but they don\'t seem to cover this specific use case (or they don\'t work/help)
import {Route} from \'vue-router\';
export con
The compiler is failing to figure out the exact shape of detailRoute
, because it does not know the shape of Route
.
One way around this is to import Route
from its source, thereby providing the information that the compiler needs to determine the shape of detailRoute
.
import { Route } from "./../node_modules/vue-router/types/router";
export const detailRoute = {
props: (route: Route) => null,
};
Since the index.d.ts file in vue-router (which you were importing in the question) re-exports Route
, it does not provide the direct reference to Route
that the compiler needed.
Another option is to opt detailRoute
out of static typing altogether.
import { Route } from 'vue-router'; // index.d.ts
export const detailRoute: any = {
props: (route: Route) => null,
};
Since any
opts-out of static typing, the compiler does not need to figure out the shape of detailRoute
.
A further is option is what you did in your own answer. Since you provided the type annotation, the compiler again does not need to figure out the shape of detailRoute
.
import { Route, RouteConfig } from 'vue-router'; // index.d.ts
export const detailRoute: RouteConfig = {
props: (route: Route) => null,
};
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/5711
When trying to emit [the module], the compiler needs to write an object type literal... representing the shape of the module. But there isn't a name in scope that refers directly to [Route], so the type "cannot be named" and there's an error.
If you add [a direct] import of [Route]... the error should go away.